top of page

Indonesian President Embarks on Landmark Reparation Program: A Step Forward or a Drop in the Ocean?

In a momentous move, Indonesia's President Joko Widodo, affectionately known as Jokowi, has launched an unprecedented reparation program for victims of past human rights abuses committed by the state. This initiative, however, has ignited apprehensions among critics, who argue it may only offer redress to a small proportion of those affected.

The President had previously expressed profound regret for a series of 12 lethal events that unfolded between 1965 and 2003. The incidents ranged from a military-led purge against alleged communists, where at least half a million people were killed, to abuses during separatist conflicts in Aceh and Papua. The unrest and violence following the protests against the autocratic rule of former President Suharto in 1998 also fall within this grim timeline.

What does this mean?

Jokowi's reparations initiative is a ground-breaking move in acknowledging and addressing state-led human rights abuses. However, the execution of the program raises several questions. The lack of clarity regarding the eligibility criteria for reparations and how victims can apply suggests a complex process that may leave many victims still seeking justice.

Moreover, the initiative's symbolic significance in demonstrating the government's commitment to prevent future abuses is considerable. Yet, how effectively this will translate into tangible measures remains to be seen.

The planned reparations vary, encompassing educational and health benefits, house renovations, and visas for victims living in exile. This wide-ranging approach suggests an intention to address diverse needs, yet its comprehensive reach is questionable.

Sri Winarso, a coordinator of a group of 1965 crackdown survivors, voiced concerns about the scope of the program. It appears that only victims recognized by government entities are being considered, leaving potentially numerous victims unaccounted for.

The complexity and enormity of the task are evident in the disparity between official and unofficial estimates of victims and survivors. Research by Indonesia's human rights commission and civil society groups estimates that the number of victims from the 1965 massacre alone could range from 500,000 to 3 million. Contrastingly, only 6,400 victims across the 12 events have been officially acknowledged.

Maria Catarina Sumarsih, a mother who lost her son in the 1998 protest, asserts that reparations hold little meaning if the perpetrators remain unpunished. This sentiment encapsulates the fundamental challenge of this program: can monetary or material compensation truly provide closure in the absence of accountability and justice? As the program commences, the world watches, hoping that it is a step towards reconciliation and a future free of such abuses.

605 views0 comments


bottom of page